Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Jadidi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. The issues I nominated this for was sourcing and the basic research I had done had not uncovered any reliable ones. Other editors more persistent than me have managed to find sources, rendering the point which I listed this on moot. (non-admin closure) ^{[Username Needed]} 10:45, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Jadidi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG ^{[Username Needed]} 14:54, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article does not have any reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per this interview recording, ifilm, Tehran Times, and Tasnim News Agency. On top of him winning an award at a major film festival, the Crystal Simorgh at the Fajr International Film Festival, and these sources, he "has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." per WP:ENT. SL93 (talk) 23:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

KeepRezvanzari (talk) 20:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly passes WP:NACTOR per the sources already presented, and those found by the Google News search linked in the nomination. Two thing concern me about this nomination. Firstly that a deletion nomination that just consisted of a piece of alphabet soup was not closed immediately - surely we should insist on at least a few words of explanation - and secondly that we seem to require higher standards of notability for non-Western topics that for Western ones. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.