Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aminoff Suffering Syndrome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:55, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aminoff Suffering Syndrome

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic fails WP:GNG and is nothing more than one of the many schemes derived by physicians to predict dementia-afflicted EOL patient outcomes in a better manner. It is not good when you can't find anyone other than Aminoff discussing the syndrome across any peer-reviewed media in significant detail. Some interesting comments over here (p. 1741 and 1742.) TrangaBellam (talk) 09:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to the article on Aminoff. Fram (talk) 09:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree that there is insufficient recognition by anyone other than Aminoff. Fails WP:GNG-- rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 17:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Too few mentions in RSes and not enough independent recognition. And most of the sources used in the article are PRIMARY, creating a misleading sense of notability. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 01:36, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable copy-and-paste from a predatory journal. Evident COI editing, too, given that an account named "Ommeog" was copying from "ommegaonline.org". See also the "Entropy definition of Human Happiness and Suffering" from the same Aminoff, which was speedily deleted under G11 and G12, recreated, and then deleted at AfD. XOR'easter (talk) 01:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd also say that the page Bechor Zvi Aminoff looks fishy. Created, infobox and all, by a new editors' 10th edit? No sign of passing WP:PROF, either. XOR'easter (talk) 01:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.