Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amethyst RPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Dungeons & Dragons campaign settings. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amethyst RPG[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Dungeons and Dragons campaign setting. PepperBeast (talk) 16:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. PepperBeast (talk) 16:02, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is Kobold Press an RS? If so, that's one review... but that's all I see. Jclemens (talk) 02:26, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Jclemens, Kobold Press is a company run by Wolfgang Baur, so for RPGs I'd say yes. BOZ (talk) 11:58, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:34, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Dungeons & Dragons campaign settings unless sources are found to estabilish stand-alone notability. Ping me in that case and I'll be happy to revisit my my vote. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per above. The award isn't enough and the GNG doesn't seem to be met, but there is still something here and a place to merge to, so... Hobit (talk) 16:41, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.