Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ames Moot Court Competition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 16:32, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ames Moot Court Competition

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not seeing significant coverage in independent, reliable sources required for WP:GNG. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Very well known and prestigious mooting competition. Also significant academic and non-academic coverage Journal of Legal Education New York Times. 15 (talk) 21:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:59, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to get some coverage almost every year and is often judged by a U.S. Supreme Court justice. Brianyoumans (talk) 17:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Brianyoumans (unsigned) above. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's probably notable, but it really needs secondary sources to demonstrate notability, which don't exist in the article at the moment. SportingFlyer T·C 13:00, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is one of the most prominent events in American legal education. A quick search revealed numerous attorneys at leading firms who list participation in their CVs. Given the existing page for the Harvard Law Review, which is largely comparable, it seems completely appropriate to have a page. NerdOfAllTrades42 (talk) 03:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.