Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Threnody

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

American Threnody[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable documentary film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 15:28, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:37, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Two IMBd references and a link to the film itself on youtube are not enough to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:22, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:55, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — I largely concur with the rationale by both Johnpacklambert and Bovineboy2008. Celestina007 (talk) 00:03, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails GNG/NFILM. Nothing notable found. Kolma8 (talk) 05:03, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant Coverage found and not pass general notability guidelines. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Documentary that delineates the important subject matter of radioactive waste. Cites are indeed missing and should be added as soon as possible. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think we try to rely largely on the established notability criteria rather than the subjective assessment of the importance of the subject of the article (or consequence). If notability cannot be established then importance is inapplicable. Kolma8 (talk) 15:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roman_Spinner: Forgot... Please check this essay on WP: Wikipedia:Subjective_importance. Thank you as always. Kolma8 (talk) 15:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
and this: WP:ITSIMPORTANT...sorry about all the double taps. Kolma8 (talk) 15:34, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sources fail to establish notability and no evidence that such sources that would establish notability exist anywhere. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Please ping me if sources do come up. I tried my own search and found nothing outside the usual self-published stuff. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.