Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:CORP criteria for inclusion. The article's purpose of existence seems to be for publicity only. My search for coverage didn't find anything significant, and most things I found were about the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, which is a different organization 10 times the size of this one. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Roost^T_C(please ping me when replying) 09:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] I found this though. Not sure about its contribution to notability. Roost^T_C(please ping me when replying) 09:51, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw that too. It isn't coverage, it just verifies the existence of a medical credential created by that org. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Minnesota. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article does not meet the WP:CORP criteria, mainly for its lack of secondary sources. I was unable to find any reliable mentions of it outside of primary or closely related sources during my most recent edits to the article.

I suggest delete based on WP:ORGSIG or merge with Oculoplastics, although it seems to be well mentioned in that article already. Martiansizzle (talk) 17:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.