Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Journal Experts (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American Journal Experts[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nomination as I found this while patrolling PROD proposed deletions. An earlier incarnation of the article has previously been speedily deleted, and deleted at AfD.

The article was proposed for deletion by User:Adamant1.

- kingboyk (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing both the general notability guideline and the one for companies. I can barely find anything independent, let alone reliable, discussing the subject. Glades12 (talk) 16:39, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Full disclosure: I created the current article, but I wasn't involved at all in the earlier deleted version (which looks promotional to me). The AfD discussion for the earlier version was in January 2008 -- more than 12 years ago -- and notability had changed significantly. Academic publishing might be niche, but the company has become well known and has received substantial coverage in the last 3 or 4 years. Even the template quick links offer articles from Inside Higher Ed, Nature (journal), Techdirt, and the state of São Paulo. I would suggest further editing and tagging. JUN1U5 (talk) 20:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't seem notable. The Nature article doesn't even talk about the company except for a quick mention that's only semi-relevant and that's the only source that might be worth it, but a single reliable source isn't enough anyway. It definitely doesn't have "substantial coverage." At least not from doing a Google search. The only thing that did come up besides social media and Wiki type site links was a couple of PR releases masquerading as news. --Adamant1 (talk) 09:13, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 02:13, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no notability. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I am not seeing any in-depth coverage, few mentions of passing about its activities is not enough per NCOMPANY. Mention in Nature here [1] "large editing companies such as American Journal Experts (AJE)" is a nice description but is, well, hardly in-depth. Voting weak as I find articles about publishers useful, but WP:ITSUSEFUL is not an accepted argument, and I have nothing else to thow for the keep side, so...--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 21:18, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a publisher, it's a copy-editing service. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:48, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.