Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Herbalists Guild

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American Herbalists Guild[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is too bad. I really wanted to spend some time improving this article, but all I was able to find was brief mentions, self-bylined articles, press releases, etc. The current sources are just the guild's website and a newsletter. Currently my university website is down and I cannot check for academic sources. CorporateM (Talk) 07:29, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Funny, I was just commenting at the Michael Tierra discussion that I didn't think this organization looked notable either. My search results are similar to nominator's. --MelanieN (talk) 18:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:37, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: AFAICT a Google search throws up only blogs, press releases and routine local coverage. Insufficient in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources, therefore not notable. BethNaught (talk) 14:56, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no WP:RS found. Fails WP:NGO. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 17:09, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.