Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American German
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this page to be original research. Google turns up nothing noticable, and no references have been provided. aliceinlampyland 17:11, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, original research at best, total ballocks at worst. Angr (t • c) 17:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Angr. Kusma (討論) 18:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete
- Not mentioned on Ethnologue
- Not mentioned in Language Contact and Grammatical Change even though there is a specific section on P41 about German dialects in the USA.
- It is not a pidgin. A pidgin is when people in a community who speak languages A and B and can't talk together with those two languages use a simplified form of language C (out of necessity) to communicate. It is not when learners of language C make mistakes when speaking to native speakers of language C.
- Quote by the author Antman "I am working on a semi-constructed, semi-natural language that I personally called Amerikanischdeutsch. " [1]
- The article was surely written as a joke...? Or do we now need to invent "pidgin languages" for French people learning Russian (Francorusse), German people learning Spanish (Españodeutsch), etc etc?
- Delete per Kusma. Pavel Vozenilek 19:56, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Olessi 20:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. This original research, and also non-notable, per Saintswithin. If the term "American German" was unique and commonly used, it might pass notability (similar to Spanglish) but I see no need for an article on the "language" itself. Lee Bailey 20:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless it can be verified. M1ss1ontomars2k4 22:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.