Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Autonomic Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

American Autonomic Society

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. I cannot find any kind of significant or independent coverage on Google for this subject. Biglulu (talk) 22:44, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A medical society with a long history and plenty of reliable references. -- 101.117.1.78 (talk) 23:56, 12 July 2014 (UTC) — 101.117.1.78 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep. It has also been recognised by a publisher, which has the society as an official society its main autonomic journal (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/9106549); the journal has a good reputation in the field of clinical autonomic neuroscience. I agree the comment about its eminence. Klbrain (talk) 17:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. YabbaDabbaDooooo! (talk) 15:06, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 13:54, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Did the nom. do a Google Scholar search? - [1]. Seems to pass WP:NOTABILITY to me. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:43, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep per above.AioftheStorm (talk) 18:24, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.