Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Airlines Flight 2821

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:27, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American Airlines Flight 2821

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Completely lacking sources and inline citations. In addition,~~ this incident fails WP:AIRCRASH. Blodance (talk) 01:08, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can not find anything notable about this incident. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 01:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 02:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There must be some other website where this kind of minor incident can be reported. WP is an encyclopedia for the general public, not airline insiders. On the other hand I would like to see more, and better articles on airline safety issues in general.Northwestgnome (talk) 02:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but incorporate relevant info into the MD-80, American Airlines and Bryce Canyon Airport articles. Mjroots (talk) 08:11, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet any of the criteria at WP:AIRCRASH. I'm not even certain that there is anything other than trivial mentions to incorporate into the other articles Mjroots mentions. Thryduulf (talk) 09:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No injuries, no death, no damage to anything. The plane just had to make a landing because of some smoke in the cockpit. I don't live in the area, but I bet this probably got little more than a 2 minute story in the area where it happened. Not even worth mentioning in other articles. TJ Spyke 17:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as we're WP:NOTNEWS, and this barely even classifies as news. Bfigura ^(talk) 04:55, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Smoke does not necessarily mean fire. How unfortunate for Wikipedia. --Triadian (talk) 05:12, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:NOT#NEWS. Joe Chill (talk) 12:04, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from nom The nom rationale is failing WP:N. Considered improving it and accidentally typed some of the problems(while they are not grounds for deletion) w/ the article as reasons for deletion. They are withdrawn. Blodance (talk) 12:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.