Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambre Frisque

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ambre Frisque

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't verify that she meets WP:NMODEL or WP:GNG, or confirm claims in article. Boleyn (talk) 12:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 15:07, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is still questionable for WP:CREATIVE with no better signs of an article. SwisterTwister talk 21:13, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:CREATIVE and searches did not turn up anything to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:49, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.