Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Rain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 08:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amber Rain

Delete. Does not meet any criteria on WP:PORN BIO. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 15:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete DJ Clayworth 15:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ❝Sverdrup❞ 17:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep famous porn star. --Haham hanuka 19:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Looks pretty successful [1]. --JJay 21:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You don't seem to have read WP:PORN BIO. One of the standards are "Performer has been in around or over 100 movies.". 47 is below our level. ❝Sverdrup❞ 14:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure I did. I stopped when I got to the word "proposed". It is neither a guideline or policy and was created by a small handful of users in the last five weeks. It thus has zero influence on my thinking. My standard is 10-20 flicks. I think that is more than sufficient to generate substantial interest that should be represented here through encyclopedic coverage of this important industry. --JJay 14:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Granted. On the other hand, many of the criteria in that proposal have already been created from previous AFDs. So the underlining consensus exists, despite your view. And given these mini litmus tests for the proposed guidelines, it seems to be fairly effective thus far. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 00:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep mildly successful, desperately needs expanding.--Andeh 23:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not seeing the slightest sign of notability, even within her industry. --Calton | Talk 01:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. based on WP:PORN BIO criteria. — RJH (talk) 18:37, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't believe we have a WP:PORN BIO - Hahnch e n 20:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. Grue 14:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.