Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambassador (company)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Enigmamsg 01:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ambassador (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Native advertising on a unremarkable marketing startup created by sockfarm at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Donnie Juanito. Contested prod. MER-C 08:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. TMGtalk 08:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. TMGtalk 08:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. TMGtalk 08:26, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable, purely promotional. 2Joules (talk) 10:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete-Nothing except news of funding(s).Fails notability requirements.∯WBGconverse 12:45, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Advitorial promotional drivel. John from Idegon (talk) 13:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I don't know when I added the page to my watchlist, but it must have been I am tracking it for possible deletion. It is plain spamcruft with specious business sources. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: The article does no more than document a company going about its business, and most of the sources are routine start-up announcements. The two Amit Chowdhry items come closest to providing editorial depth, but again these are by a start-up specialist. I don't see sufficient coverage on either Zferral or the Ambassador platform to meet WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with above, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 17:00, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.