Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amaron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amaron[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. A minor character in the book of Mormon with no independent reliable sources. Big Money Threepwood (talk) 18:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Christianity, and Latter Day Saints. Big Money Threepwood (talk) 18:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. If we have decided that Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day does not apply to Mormonism, chipping away at little bits of Mormonism is a bit pointless. Here are some references that I found using Google Books which the nominator ought to have found while doing WP:BEFORE: Reference 1, Reference 2, Reference 3. Лисан аль-Гаиб (talk) 01:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Лисан аль-Гаиб: and before making this comment you should have checked whether the linked sources contain significant independent coverage... They do not appear to. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~:*Delete As the above users sources demonstrate, this person is only mentioned in-universe, such as the devotionals linked The Trash Compactor (talk) 00:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

The Trash Compactor has now been indef blocked as Wikipedia:NOTHERE — Maile (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not finding the sort of significant coverage in independent reliable sources that would suggest that the topic is suitable for a stand-alone wikipedia page. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable and as per the nom. Bhivuti45 (talk) 18:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per filer & Horse Eye's Back's reasonings. If appropriate, merge to a suitable (and notable) article. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 16:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.