Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amarillo by Morning (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star Mississippi 01:33, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amarillo by Morning (film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:MOVIE and GNG Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 16:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Texas. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sourcing is admittedly pretty difficult to dig out of the false positives and so on, but I'm finding it. It took a while, but I also found a source that shows that it was screened at the MOMA, not a small feat. It was part of a retrospective, but the fact it was chosen shows that it was seen as an important work of his. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And by difficult I mean that finding sources is like trying to pull teeth from an Olympic athlete running in the opposite direction at full speed. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the reception section now shows coverage in multiple reliable sources, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 06:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.