Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar Preet (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amar Preet (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable YouTube released film - no sign it could pass Wikipedia:Notability (films) or WP:GNG. Only reference is to a 1954 film and two of the few blue links are to dead people. KylieTastic (talk) 19:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 08:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The articles related to upcoming punjabi telifilm Amar Preet (film)is absolutely right,nothing wrong in this Articcles,Punjabi Telifilm 'Amar-Preet " is a upcoming movie,,releasing soon in this month March (2017) film is ready ,any body can see it now online the links of youtub is : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekea5TfGlNM if anybody wants to more information about this movie he can quarie/ask from me.I knows all things about this movie Amar-Preet here is my email;[email protected] and here it is my face book link also ; https://www.facebook.com/santoshkumari.raginisharma with warm regards ..Santosh Kumari Ragini

Hi Santosh kumari Ragini just because the film exists is not good enough for Wikipedia - See Wikipedia:Notability (films) for the notability requirements. KylieTastic (talk) 13:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - no evidence of notability and only reference provided is unrelated. Melcous (talk) 12:41, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete NN. Future film is meaningless until released, and press articles and references make it notable. -- Alexf^(talk) 13:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability at all Spiderone 12:23, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can't see how it can possibly pass WP:NFILM when practically all the actors aren't even notable themselves. Ajf773 (talk) 12:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFILM.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.