Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Sickler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have taken note of MichaelQSchmidt's keep vote, but note that the articles in the second Google news link contain nothing non-trivial and the first shows only brief local coverage. Therefore, Wine Guy and Bearian's comments appear stronger. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Sickler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to have had multiple small roles in notable television series but I can't find anything to substantiate her own notability... HJ Mitchell | fancy a chat? 01:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In her most "significant" role (on Charmed), she appeared in 11 of 92 episodes over four seasons, hardly significant. Fails WP:ENT. Wine Guy Talk 11:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per significant coverage in reliable sources. Seems she was notable as a child model [1] before she grew up to act. Coverage then and even minor coverage now [2] grant notability per WP:NTEMP. Time to expand and further source. What can be accomplished through regular editing is no reason to delete.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelQSchmidt (talk • contribs) 20:35, 25 January 2010 UTC

I really don't see much non-trivial coverage in those sources. While I agree her name appears to have been floating around for a while, I still don't see notability per WP:ENTERTAINER. Wine Guy Talk 21:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the problem is sourcing. I can't find any legitimate film reviews that mention her, except for the Times listing and a cursory mention at the WatchThis website. Bearian (talk) 22:17, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.