Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda McClendon
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Amanda McClendon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Elected official with no significant coverage outside local sources; fails notability criteria for politicians and WP:GNG. – Ploni (talk) 21:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Tennessee. Ploni (talk) 21:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Appears to fail WP:GNG, as no sources that provide WP:SIGCOV appear to exist. Curbon7 (talk) 18:57, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:48, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.