Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda Brumfield

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:33, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Brumfield[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable person, (notability is not inherited through the relationship to her farther) and as tragic as this homicide is, there is nothing to suggest any lasting significance to the crime. What coverage there is is limited to the routine coverage of a news story nothing more. Mt king ^(edits) 05:30, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As said by the nom., notability is not transferred by familial relation. Also, she fails the WP:PERP notability test since the references are only "contemporaneous news coverage." Magister Scienta ^talk (Editor Review) 06:05, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:PERP and having a famous father doesn't make her notable.Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:37, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:58, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:59, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Yes I agree being the daughter of a famous person doesnt make her notable. But her crime in itself and the fact that it has been covered by major media outlets makes it so. She isnt less notable then many other "murderess" that has articles on wikipedia. One could argue that this article shouldnt be treated different when it comes to notability based on merits just because she is the daughter of a famous person.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:56, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:PERP, local news of no global nor historical interest. - DonCalo (talk) 11:10, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:PERP. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:52, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.