Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amala Shaji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Arguments come down to "meets GNG" versus "no it doesn't." No one demonstrated the available sources are not valid towards notability, neither did anyone clearly demonstrate they are. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 03:29, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amala Shaji[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability for this promotional article on a tiktok user. It has been stated that she is a model and musician, although this has not been proven by the sources cited. Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG, and WP:NMODEL. Thilsebatti (talk) 08:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, India, and Kerala. Thilsebatti (talk) 08:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are many sources to prove that she is an Internet celebrity (social media artist/star)[1] Can it be proved whether dancer WP:ARTIST Notability passes?? -- Owner of magical cat 🐈 (talk) 9:26, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

You've written an article about an internet celebrity for the second time. She does not meet any of the WP:ARTIST requirements. This is just an another case of WP:RUNOFTHEMILL. Thilsebatti (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A celebrity vanity page. Fails GNG. Article has some weird claims that she is a social worker,model and actor. She has not acted in any movies yet and is not a big boss contestant. Only thing she is having are some Instagram and tik tok followers which is not a notability criteria.116.68.101.172 (talk) 06:57, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Most coverage is about being a Big Boss contestant, but it's just enough. Most is in malayalam script, so a Gnews search brings up lots there. I'd give it a pass.Oaktree b (talk) 17:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. The sources used in the article, although mostly tabloid, demonstrate enough notability to 'get over the line'. Redtree21 (talk) 11:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does't meet WP:GNG, nor WP:ARTIST . Dcotos (talk) 08:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Specific assessment of the sources available would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NotAGenious (talk) 12:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom does not meet NACTOR.Tame Rhino (talk) 13:50, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.