Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alyssa Giannetti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 07:33, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alyssa Giannetti[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails to meet notability guidelines as defined by WP:NSOCCER. In my opinion, fails overarching WP:GNG as all other listed references/citations are trivial mentions (e.g. signing with a team, leaving a team, etc.) which for me doesn't satisfy WP:SIGCOV and many run in to WP:COISOURCE issues (e.g. publicity by her teams/leagues). Upon a cursory search, I could only find one, maybe two, sources I would consider adding to the article (though did find other routine and first-person interviews, podcasts, etc.), whereas the PROD was removed with no reason ("rm prod - take to afd if desired"). GauchoDude (talk) 20:19, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:30, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:31, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 07:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes WP:GNG with the references already in the article, the articles listed above and Norwegian coverage such as [1]. SportingFlyer T·C 20:52, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:37, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - As I'm sure you're aware, WP:SIGCOV states "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." The article you provided, like many others, barely mentions the subject or does so as part of WP:ROUTINE coverage which still doesn't satisfy WP:GNG in my opinion. GauchoDude (talk) 15:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really care about whether the article is kept, and that link probably wasn't the best considering I don't read Norwegian, but a Norwegian language search uncovered a number of possible WP:GNG hits. SportingFlyer T·C 22:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:06, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Goalkeeper of the Year in Norway (edging out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madalyn Schiffel) is a "significant honor" well into WP:BIO#Sports personalities territory. There's an extensive interview [2] and bits of coverage in Norwegian media [3] which nudges WP:GNG. Although I'm fully aware that someone will be along in a minute to call the first one a blog and pretend the second one is routine. That's invariably how these things go down when elite female players are involved! It's as sad and predictable as GiantSnowman's robotic "fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL" vote. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 01:16, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Personal attacks have no place. (Is there an echo in here?) Don't bring the level of discourse down like that. Comment on the notability of the article subject, not on other editors, please. – Levivich 02:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Plays for the top league in her country, Goalkeeper of the Year, works for me. – Levivich 02:36, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG (nothing more than routine coverage, some of it primary) and WP:NFOOTBALL (never played in a FPL or senior international football. The Goalkeeper of the Year award is only for goalies in her league of 12 teams. Playing top division football = article keep is not a precedent that should be set. Dougal18 (talk) 08:38, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:GNG with sources in article and above (I think User:Dougal18 is mistaken when they claim nothing is more than routine - how is this routine?) Nfitz (talk) 17:38, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The interview is sigcov but Everybody Soccer focuses on goalkeepers mostly in the American game. Giannetti is only being interviewed because of her position and involvement in US college football. That interview shouldn't be enough for her article to survive AFD. Dougal18 (talk) 19:54, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Much of the interview is about her play in Europe in addition to her play at the university level. In particular it talks about her win of Goalkeeper of the Year in the Norwegian Toppserien - for which there's another reference that I'll add to the article. Nfitz (talk) 22:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per remarks of SportingFlyer and per Levivich. Passes WP:GNG with the references in the article Lubbad85 (☎) 17:27, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:HEY. Not the article it was when this AFD started. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.