Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvin Singh (activist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alvin Singh (activist)[edit]

Alvin Singh (activist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minimally sourced WP:BLP of a person notable only as an organizer and unsuccessful candidate in municipal politics. Doesn't pass WP:NPOL for those roles, there's no other claim of notability here substantive enough to get him past another subject-specific inclusion guideline instead, and the volume of sourcing provided doesn't even get him over WP:GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 16:58, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 00:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 00:55, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 05:32, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Definitely fails WP:POLITICIAN. As to the GNG? A Google news search yields nothing useful, a regular search throws up either insignificant mentions or non-independent sources, which are insufficient to show notability. BethNaught (talk) 08:21, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.