Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alton Campaign vs. Free Speech (1836-38)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 02:33, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alton Campaign vs. Free Speech (1836-38)[edit]

Alton Campaign vs. Free Speech (1836-38) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not quite sure what the subject is to be honest, but this seems not so much an encyclopedia article, rather an instance of original research. I can't find other reliable sources connecting the murder of Lovejoy with ending free speech in general. ... discospinster talk 16:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and United States of America. ... discospinster talk 16:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Pure OR; there isn't any source I can find that refers to the mob killing of Elijah Lovejoy as the "Alton Campaign vs. Free Speech" except the self-published book that is cited in the article. The article itself just strings together a bunch of disconnected events where a public figure mentioned the Lovejoy killing, without making any effort to link them; these events are covered better in other articles and thus the Alton Campaign article duplicates other WP content (badly). WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    There was good critique that the issue of orphan article should be addressed. As that issue was in the process of being addressed, it appears that WeirdNAnnoyed destroyed the capacity to make those links – rather non-constructive. Does WeirdNAnnoyed run Wikipedia? This antagonistic behavior discourages those who are not "insiders" from taking the trouble to contribute to Wikipedia. Ark2 (talk) 20:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – I documented some of my objections to the article on its talk page. Were the contributor more amenable to taking constructive criticism, I'd suggest draftify while working through the POV issues and unsupported claims. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 20:19, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    There has been an attempt to respond to good critique. Maybe Wikipedia experts can do this better. Ark2 (talk) 20:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Abraham Lincoln's Lyceum address. There is good info here, but it's not an article. The title seems like complete WP:OR, it reads like an essay, and the crucial points are either covered in the Lincoln article or belong as background in the Lyceum Address. I don't see draftify fixing this. Last1in (talk) 13:03, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider Merge suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there is some content added to Abraham Lincoln's article at Abraham Lincoln#Education and move to Illinois, but that's the wrong section. Some editing is needed and some is uncited. So, I will check that out, too.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abraham Lincoln article - Removed content from the wrong section - and summarized into in a section of that timeline (1836 to 1838) here.
Timeline of events leading to the American Civil War added 1836 Lynching of Francis McIntosh here.
Added Jon Meacham's opinion to Elijah Parish Lovejoy here. There's already mention of Francis McIntosh and Abraham Lincoln in the article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 19:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Struck out the part that is done in my vote.–CaroleHenson (talk) 21:15, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.