Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alt-M

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:38, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alt-M[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail wp:GNG. After some searching, most mentions seem to be by Cato websites (not independent) or on blogs (not reliable). In particular, notability is not inherited so, while Cato is notable, its blogs may not be. Happy Squirrel (talk) 02:39, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I had tagged this to encourage its author to add any available references to demonstrate notability, but none have been forthcoming, nor are my searches locating any. Fails WP:NWEB, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:07, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none of this suggests a better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 18:42, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 18:43, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.