Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AlphaStar Corporation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- AlphaStar Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 18:01, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:33, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Another article about a provider of advanced engineering analysis services and of specialized software for the analysis of complex engineering material systems. This actually sounds more historically important and encyclopedically significant, and, well, interesting, than 99% of these software articles. Google News and Books find only press releases and directory listings, and the article text doesn't give many leads either; it's too vague and abstract to tell what they really do or enable disinterested editors to fix it by editing. Delete this -- it's also advertising, of course -- but without prejudice to an article written by a technical person rather than a PR person. Unless all the specifics are doublenaught spy stuff -- and if they are, why do you want a Wikipedia article? - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 04:53, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.