Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Along for the Ride (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 13:41, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Along for the Ride (film)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFF: "Sources must be used to confirm the start of principal photography after shooting has begun." Sources all indicate that filming will begin but nothing confirmed that shooting has already begun. Move to draft until such sources exist to indicate notability. BOVINEBOY2008 09:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:36, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I found this, which mentions that filming began. I've also fleshed out the production section as well. It's not super heavy coverage, but it's enough to where I'd argue a weak keep on my end. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep thanks to the finds from ReaderofthePack that actually post date the film start. I'm not sure its really a notable production, but if you just apply the 2-source guide to film starts, it passes. Not worth draftifying just to turn around again and publish it in short time when the coverage we have is there. -2pou (talk) 02:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.