Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aloe framesii

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aloe framesii

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This taxon is not accepted and listed as a synonym of a subspecies. Subspecies are not usually sufficiently notable to have articles, and synonyms certainly should not. See "Aloe framesii". Plants of the World Online. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Retrieved 16 December 2021. for evidence of synonymy from a reputable source. YorkshireExpat (talk) 22:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom. Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom, although I would have preferred redirecting this to Aloe microstigma if that page had existed. AryKun (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.