Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Almaron Dickinson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. Page was nominated in error. (non-admin closure) -- Tavix (talk) 20:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Almaron Dickinson[edit]

Almaron Dickinson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Will combine in a sec Si Trew (talk) 00:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I think the tag was meant to go onto the redirect, Almaron, but not on this page. This page needs citations, but is definitely notable. Smmurphy(Talk) 06:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @SimonTrew: It is safe to assume that this is another accidental nomination? -- Tavix (talk) 18:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Usually a nominator presents the grounds for deleting an article but I see nothing stated here so it's an automatic keep from me. Liz Read! Talk! 18:19, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely total cock up on my part as User:Tavix implied. I as many admins may notice am listing stacks of redirects and accidentally nominate the article sometimes instead of the redirect, so absolutely, keep and so forth, total cock up on my part sorry. Si Trew (talk) 18:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.