Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alma Junction, Colorado

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alma Junction, Colorado[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Railroad junction with no significant coverage to establish notability on its own. At best this could be covered by a single sentence in Alma, Colorado. –dlthewave ☎ 17:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Colorado. –dlthewave ☎ 17:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A single sentence doesn't cut it, as this one is in the history books. If only editors had consulted them instead of stupid fact-free entertainment news articles about South Park. Uncle G (talk) 01:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per rewrite performed by Uncle G (WP:HEY) and WP:GEOLAND. RecycledPixels (talk) 18:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per excellent upgrade that establishes notability. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 19:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Keep: coverage which establishes notability has been added to the article. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:07, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Good job.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 00:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.