Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allysin Chaynes (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Allysin Chaynes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. Under the current PORNBIO consensus, winning a niche award without other significant RS content is not enough to sustain a BLP. Even if the niche award were somehow seen as meeting PORNBIO standards, that technical pass would be outweighed by the gross deficiency in RS content/coverage. No nontrivial pertinent GNews or GBooks hits. Most news coverage relates to a Canadian drag performer with the same stage name, clearly an entirely different person. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:52, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 18:37, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- unremarkable actor; minor award. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable performer in pornography who does not meet the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.