Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allysin Chaynes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 15:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Allysin Chaynes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet any of the four WP:PORNBIO criteria, as she has not won a well-known award; has not received nominations for well-known awards in multiple years; has not made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre; and has not been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media. NW (Talk) 22:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She passes PORNBIO. If you don't think her XRCO Award is not well known enough despite the last AfD, she has received AVN Award nominations in multiple years.[1][2] Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 05:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Morbidthoughts. Multiple awards over different years, and notable to the genre, meet inclusion criteria. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 11:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:58, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Morbidthoughts. The XRCO Award win is significant enough for WP:PORNBIO. She also has AVN nominations in multiple years. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 01:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Morbidthoughts. Only weighing in on these porn bio AfDs that seem most notable.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 04:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.