Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allripe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allripe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find evidence of notability. I would have PRODed if not for a previous PROD in 2014. Adam9007 (talk) 23:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. very minor copany; the refs are basically press releases for its various minor accomlishments. Not one of them is a RS for notability DGG ( talk ) 00:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt as this has essentially been deleted twice, once was worse than the other, but this current one is the worst of all given it's advertising, so considering all of thid together, I cannot confide someone would then restart it how it should be. This article is a PR campaign to simply advertise what the company wants to say itself. SwisterTwister talk 01:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete bordering on an advert. LibStar (talk) 08:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete- thinly veiled advertisement. Sources are advertorials mostly. Reyk _YO! 09:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see any claim of significance here and there's literally nothing available in reliable sources. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:30, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.