Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allied Express (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 15:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Allied Express[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run of the mill company, no in depth coverage. Fails NCORP. Praxidicae (talk) 12:29, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence provided of significant notability. We already have User:Allied_Express and it appears to company has been trying to promote itself here for a bit. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:35, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Passing coverage only. Submissions for articles on this company should be treated with suspicion, since they have been trying via numerous accounts to force an article into Wikipedia since 2015. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. There is a little bit of non trival coverage but not enough. It is a relatively well known company in Australia. If this article is kept then it needs balance, currently POV in so far as it fails to mention the Christmas delivery failure which saw it get roasted in at least three major social media and review sites which was also picked up by mainstream IRS media. Aoziwe (talk) 13:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt, given the history. This is corporate spam. I've blocked the creator for UPE. MER-C 17:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in depth coverage not available. Reddragon7 (talk) 04:26, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & salt - recurrent spam. Cabayi (talk) 09:14, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.