Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance for Green Socialism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alliance for Green Socialism

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a gazetteer of political parties. Recent discussions and consequent deletions for Independent Green Voice and Scottish Family Party which are active parties that are running candidates show there are recent precedents for the wider Wikipedia community agreeing that not all political parties are notable, and notability does not attach itself to political parties as a right. This article is lacking in WP:RS with most of the sources referencing the party's own website. It also fails WP:PROMO and also has no evidence of WP:GNG and WP:ORG and general achievement. Angryskies (talk) 15:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Angryskies (talk) 15:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Angryskies (talk) 15:46, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Angryskies (talk) 15:46, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Angryskies (talk) 15:46, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It has a little traction in the history books. ISBN 9780826493668 has some tidbits here and there, for example. Uncle G (talk) 15:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I approve of the nomination not least because it uses my usual format for nominating political parties. My influence has started to show at last! As per the nom, this party is not notable and the article only proves the party exists, not what it has achieved. doktorb _words^deeds 16:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.