Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Shook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7 (non-admin closure) Esquivalience ^t 00:17, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allen Shook

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources provided for notability. Appears to be a self-bio page. Not the first time this user has done this. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 15:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Terry Shook and Terry A. Shook for example. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - General Health ‖ 15:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And User:Melanie Specht. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 15:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also please consider salting, based on prior history. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 17:13, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note this justification by the article creator on the talk page for why the article should be kept:

You can't find nothing online on this person...because it hasn't came out yet. To say this person isn't important of significant of any any source is a moron.

--‖ Ebyabe ^talk - State of the Union ‖ 17:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close Have speedied. Unsourced BLP - with no assertion of notability (WP:NOTINHERITED). Creator's claim is test edit. Widefox; talk 00:23, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete already done. ― Padenton|✉ 16:12, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.