Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen Buckley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete specifically without prejudice to a sourced recreation with greater assertion of notability. Daniel (talk) 00:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allen Buckley[edit]

Non-notable politician who ran as a Libertarian without much success in 2004. No other claim to notability made. Fails WP:BIO. Redfarmer (talk) 23:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails Wikipedia:BIO#Politicians. Kakofonous (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Far too many substantive articles on this person at Google News for us to delete. (Mind meal (talk) 01:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Delete per Kakofonous. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - counting google results doesn't establish notability, especially when some of them aren't even about this person. No indication of notability, unelected politician. -- Whpq (talk) 10:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Most of the news links are relevant. Now, how does providing Google News search results not help to establish notability? I wonder if you could offer the logic behind that assertion? It seems to me that pointing other editors to multiple reliable sources covering an individual (as was the case here) assists the AFD process. Ralph Nader is an unelected politician, also. Why does he have an article? Oh, I know! Because reliable sources have written about him! Doh! (Yes, bad example with Ralph. He is known for many things. But, even still, I rest my point)(Mind meal (talk) 23:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

delete no reference, not notable enough Logastellus (talk) 19:11, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.