Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegra Versace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:37, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Allegra Versace[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no notability here, only violations of NOT INHERITED and NOT TABLOID. I recognize there are references, but the references are not to anything of the significance that would belong in an encyclopedia. DGG ( talk ) 01:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Satisfies WP:GNG. The references are actually in depth, from very reliable sources, and span an extended period. She's the subject of articles in Harper's Bazaar, the Daily Telegraph, and the Sydney Morning Herald. Pburka (talk) 01:26, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. BabbaQ (talk) 11:54, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as she is the major shareholder in the Gianni Versace S.p.A. company, a point that overcome any WP:NOTINHERITED concern. Furthermore, she appears to pass WP:BASIC and WP:GNG being subject of multiple published reliable, independent, secondary sources. Cavarrone (talk) 07:01, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per arguments by pburka and Cavarrone. In this case, her notoriety may have, in the truest sense, been inherited, but the fact is that she sits on the board of directors of a major fashion house and is widely covered in RS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celtechm (talk • contribs) 06:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - She passes WP:GNG. I don't see a reason for deletion.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She definitely passes WP:GNG. There are plenty of reliable sources. Obviously, the reason for the coverage is solely because she's a Versace child, but the coverage is nevertheless focused on her. Remember how Paris Hilton became notable? ;) By the way, I'm not sure being a Versace board member/shareholder in and of itself makes her notable since she obviously inherited it. --76.189.114.163 (talk) 17:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pburka. NOTINHERITED doesn't foreclose notability, and while it is normally suspect, this person appears to be notable based on the quality and quantity of sources. Bearian (talk) 20:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.