Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allama Syed Zeeshan Haider Jawadi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 08:22, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Allama Syed Zeeshan Haider Jawadi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article contains only one source, and doesn't show a significant claim to notability. The creator has also admitted that the subject is his grandfather in the licensing rationale on File:Allama Jawadi.jpg, opening up a WP:COI issue. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:45, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- searches did not turn up enough to meet either WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:10, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:10, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:10, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the source I added to the article when deprodding spells his name "Allamah Sayyid Zeeshan Haider Jawadi" and I'm sure that many other transcriptions are possible. I believe that "Allama" and "Syed" are honorifics rather than part of his name, but I may be wrong. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There are numerous sources[1][2] where his views were discussed by his peers. The subject may meet WP:NAUTHOR but I have to look more. D4iNa4 (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have added some more references. We now have enough, even in English with the transcription issues, to show notability. If kept the title should be changed to something without the honorifics, and I guess that Zeeshan Haider Jawadi is a good a transcription as any. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:34, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - We should move the article to Zeeshan Haider Jawadi and probably remove the COI tag now. D4iNa4 (talk) 17:42, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment : The creator of the contested article has linked this page through a redirect to their own User Page. -The Gnome (talk) 13:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs assesment of the sources added to the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep The sources seem to provide it with enough coverage for a keep. Although the article itself doesn't have any notable content. The fact that the creator of the page links to this page as his user is quite strange tho. Wikiman5676 (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.