Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All time appearances in European Cup and UEFA Champions League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:12, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All time appearances in European Cup and UEFA Champions League

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTSTATS and WP:LISTCRUFT. It is also redundant to the European Cup and UEFA Champions League records and statistics article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. QED237 (talk) 21:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – As per motivation above, list already exists in other article and shouled not have its own article. Also discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#All time appearances in European Cup and UEFA Champions League, which lead to this AfD. QED237 (talk) 21:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable LISTCRUFT / OR. Giant Snowman 07:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - yeah, does not warrant own article. -Koppapa (talk) 14:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Or merge (which is already done). Already merged, no reason to keep a redirect. This article can never be anything more than 2 tables (which should probably be merged themselves into a single table). Non-notable, pointless separate list article of basically 'trivia' information. I could be wrong, but does this not also meet WP:A10 for Speedy Delete? ― Padenton|✉ 05:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite, as it isn't a 100% duplication. An article already containing the same information isn't quite the same as one dedicated to said information, if you get what I mean. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Delete - I think something like this could find a home within another article, but it appears pretty obvious that it doesn't warrant its own article. - J man708 (talk) 20:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 17:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.