Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All You Need Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:33, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All You Need Music

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a company, with no claim of more than local notability and not enough strong reliable source coverage -- this is sourced 50 per cent to primary sources (its own self-published website, the self-published websites of people or organizations that have had some form of direct affiliation with it, etc.) and 50 per cent to purely local media coverage in its own area. To qualify for a Wikipedia article, however, a company has to pass WP:CORPDEPTH requirements, by having wider coverage beyond just its own local area — but this doesn't have that. And for added bonus there's a conflict of interest here, as the creator's username corresponds directly to the name of the PR person for one of the affiliated organizations named in the article body. Bearcat (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- This is an obvious violation, its not notable at all. It seems that the owner wants to use wikipedia for free publicity.--Rusf10 (talk) 00:42, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 01:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 01:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 01:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - pure promo of a non-notable local retailer. Lacks sufficient RS mentions to meet notability under WP:NCORP. PohranicniStraze (talk) 23:44, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet notability guidelines. Hrodvarsson (talk) 01:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.