Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Queens Chess
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:55, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- All Queens Chess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of any notability. A single source and the company's own web site. Searches are difficult and tend to be dominated by subjects other than this game, but, despite this, nothing conveying notability could be seen. Fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 09:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Velella Velella Talk 09:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. I clicked the "books" link as well as the "news" link in "Find sources." Neither one returned anything that made me think this subject was notable. Colin Gerhard (talk) 10:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - A non-notable chess variant. Searching for sources turns up some sales pages, and the usual database entries in sites like BoardGameGeek, but no actual coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Rorshacma (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.