Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-Party Parliamentary Jazz Appreciation Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All-Party Parliamentary Jazz Appreciation Group[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure generally how we are to assess voluntary and non-official groupings of British parliamentarians, but this seems to be one that has almost no coverage in RS that I can find. At best they run a minor annual jazz price which has been reported a few times. As an AtD it could be merged with Parliamentary Jazz Awards but I have my doubts about whether that is notable either. JMWt (talk) 11:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United Kingdom. JMWt (talk) 11:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect: An article on a recreational association for which membership is not a defining characteristic. While I agree that the Parliamentary Jazz Awards article may also be dubious, referenced to announcement-based coverage, it could serve as a redirect target. AllyD (talk) 12:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seeking consensus for either delete or redirection.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timothytyy (talk) 11:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This seems similar to caucuses in the US Congress, but most of those aren't notable and this lacks independent coverage. Reywas92^Talk 14:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.