Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alif Oil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alif Oil[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. WP:BEFORE searching fails to find any WP:RS to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. I found lots of advertising for their products, lots of WP:NOTDIRECTORY listings, but nothing that talks about them as a company in depth. This article has already been through the grand tour of process: WP:A7, deletion review, and WP:PROD (where nobody objected in a week, so it was deleted, then backed out per this conversation. -- RoySmith (talk) 11:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ...per nom. I usually have plenty to say on these things; but the nom- and particularly that expired PROD- have said everything. Although that A7 might have had a longer lfe as a G11. — fortunavelut luna 12:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, for the love of god. I only undeleted because you can't really object to a request to undelete a PROD, but per my deletion comments when I deleted it at PROD I thought the undisputed PROD was sufficient. I do agree that it was process wonkery to resurrect this just to AfD it. Let's put this to bed. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the consensus of the other editors. Also no credible indication of significance in my opinion.--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article, which I have written says having a reference: It is the largest foreign investment in the local agricultural sector to date with a planned palm plantation and oil refinery project in Mindanao.Sarcelles (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.