Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Og

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:41, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alien Og

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage to justify a standalone article. Many of the cannabis strain articles are sourced by a couple vendor websites, and should be deleted or merged to Cannabis strains. --Another Believer _(Talk) 05:46, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This nomination also applies to Bubble Gum Cannabis Strain, Chemdawg 4, Chernobyl Cannabis Strain, Cinderella 99, Fire OG, Golden Pineapple, and Strawberry Cough.

Not yet. As an experienced editor you know that this nomination does not apply to those other articles and until you have placed a nomination tag on them, linking to this discussion. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:42, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, sorry. I may be an experienced editor, but I am actually not a frequent AfD nominator or participant. Thanks for the reminder. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:09, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've added nomination tags, hopefully correctly. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looks fine. Notifying the article creators is considered good Afd etiquette, but is not required. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:37, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Reads like an ad, and has no use at all. note: A couple more, (almost) all the articles made by this guy fit.JerrySa1 (talk) 21:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:55, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As it's claimed to be a medical marijuana strain, I've added to medicine sorting page, too. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:12, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A few of the articles list biological effects which need much much stronger sourcing. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all articles mentioned by nom. It's not just a notability issue; it's a combination of advertorial editing and suspect PR sourcing. I would recommend deletion of all; and if someone is interested, they can add the details later to Cannabis strains, as the nom suggests. Thanks. Lourdes 08:52, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.