Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia DeBrincat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:51, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alicia DeBrincat[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After some research, and reviewing of current citations, this article appears to fail WP:ARTIST, sadly. I like her work, but, all of the citations I have found are mere mentions. Her most notable exhibition appears to be a few pieces in a hotel in NYC. I think right now, it might be WP:TOOSOON for DeBrincat to have their own article. SarahStierch (talk) 18:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - her CV is online and for a CV to have an absence of evidence of notability is pretty strong evidence of absence. If she's notable she isn't claiming it. Fails WP:ARTIST] Neonchameleon (talk) 20:41, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.