Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice in Wonderland (2010 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 18:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alice in Wonderland (2010 film)[edit]

Article for a film that "may" be released in 2010! While there are a few sources on production, I don't think its enough to meet WP:NFF, particularly when its already been "in the making" for a year, and the supposed release date pushed back. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 15:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Given that it's a notable film being directed by Tim Burton and starring Johnny Depp. (If it was some no-name independent film with only a blog for it's source that would be another matter entirely) Unless it's a hoax or not going to be made.--CyberGhostface (talk) 16:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Yes, the talent line-up is impressive. But announcing that a film is going to be made is not the same thing as actually have a film that is in progress or has been completed. I can't support keeping the article, as per WP:NFF. Changed to Keep following the arrival of new sources that were cited below. Ecoleetage (talk) 16:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete, like Ecoleetage, since I don't see any verification that shooting has begun. Cliff smith ^talk 16:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC) Changed to keep per new sources cited below. Cliff smith ^talk 18:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No verification that shotting has begun. Schuym1 (talk) 16:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Doesn't this article indicate that it's being filmed?--CyberGhostface (talk) 16:33, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it's filming. Alientraveller (talk) 17:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article gives the impression that some sort of second unit shooting just began (there is no mention of any of the stars being present or comment from Tim Burton on what's being made). Ecoleetage (talk) 17:29, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The director and the star began filming last Monday. It's being made. Perfectly fine under WP:FUTFILMS. Alientraveller (talk) 17:58, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep per sources above, some filming has already started or will start in October. Sources exist and the time frame is short (or already here) for filming to start. Hobit (talk) 18:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep per Google News and articles [1], [2], [3], filming HAS begun. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant coverage by multiple secondary sources. Dekkappai (talk) 18:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NFF. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 18:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Films in production are perfectly notable if there are sources confirming production is underway - and there are plenty. The fact it's been in production for a long time is irrelevant. Shrek was in production for so long its original lead voice actor died. James Cameron's Avatar has been in production for years, too. 23skidoo (talk) 18:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.