Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Patten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus; leaning toward keep. MCB 04:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Patten[edit]

Notability seems to stem from being the daughter of Chris Patten. Roles in minor TV series and theatre do not convince me. Bollywood role seems to have been a minor part. Samsara (talk • contribs) 09:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - the Bollywood role seems to be relatively important in terms of the plot of a film which seems to have done well, although I don't know quite what qualifies as a "box office success" in Bollywood terms. Certainly if that's not the case, and the film is insignificant or her role is smaller than I think, she's not notable. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - Alice Patten deserves an article as the role in the movie Rang De Basanti is very important. The movie happens to be the official entry for Academy Awards 2007 from India, so it is an important movie.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Her role - not a minor one, but a key part of the plot structure - in a very major recent Bollywood movie is well known in India Bwithh 01:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as a trivia fact at her much more notable father's page until she more obviously deserves independent mention. Eusebeus 10:35, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stong Keep I say keep her in wikipedia. Far less well-known actresses are in wiki, so why not someone who had such a key role in one of India's most important films of recent years? It's not alll about the who's who with tight abs out in American and the UK — 202.78.234.102 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Delete. There are more important things to be contained into a serious encyclopedia. Articles like this are a show of the mediocre culture of the mean Wikipedian. --Attilios 21:06, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Other actors with similar credentials don't have articles. It can be recreated later if she becomes notable. KrakatoaKatie 01:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.