Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aliando Syarief

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Garuda3 (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aliando Syarief

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:N. Only one reference in a non-English article about another celebrity. Has been tagged for lack of references for a BLP since 2015. Davidelit (Talk) 14:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep has won numerous SCTV awards per the chart; the awards look notable. Oaktree b (talk) 15:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:ANYBIO, Awards section referenced now but still needs to update. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 15:20, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on the awards and meeting WP:ANYBIO.Pershkoviski (talk) 18:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Ultimately, the sourcing does satisfy WP:NOTABILITY requirements. If it wasn’t for this, I would say delete. However, the subject has demonstrable notability as demonstrated by WP:SIGCOV in independent WP:RS. What this ultimately comes down to is whether or not the subject is notable, such that if the subject isn’t notable then the article should be deleted, whereas if the subject is notable then the article should be kept. What I see in the article and looking into the background on my own, is that the subject is indeed notable. The most important question to answer is whether or not the sources establish notability. There is a clear case to be made that the sources do establish notability. As such, the appropriate outcome is to keep the article. WP:ANYBIO is also met. Shawn Teller (he/her) (talk) 03:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.