Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Tim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:41, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Tim[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff piece on non-notable individual, apparently nothing more than an amateur musician and writer, mostly unsourced, no signs of independent coverage. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As nominator states; no real claim to notability WP:GNG / WP:BIO. Statements such as "two unpublished books, [...] which are soon going to be available in stores" don't help, either. Chzz ► 11:36, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A web browse shows "notability" as: a myspace, a facebook page, a 2002 review of an album, a photograph on deviantart.com, an image page on flickr, and one or two other minor "achievements". The originator and major contributor of the article, User:Samia BR, (Samia Baleegh? - see Bubble Up Video and FireStation at AAG) could be closely associated with Tim [1], not in itself wrong, but could show a non-NPOV, and a tendency to elaborate something that is not notable. Acabashi (talk) 13:03, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.